Tuesday 30 August 2011

Transformers: Dark of the Moon (2011)

It is a sign of my delayed reviewing schedule for this year that I am only just getting round to one of the summers biggest blockbusters, long after all who wanted to see it will have already done so, but nonetheless I find the film worthy of discussion, exemplifying as it does the very best and worse that Michael Bay and large scale Hollywood productions have to offer at this rather strange time for the industry.
.
The third in Bay’s trilogy of Transformers films (though he may be done, the film’s $1bn at the global box office ensures there will be more films to come, of that we can be sure) Dark of the Moon has the definite feel of someone making a grand statement. It is a colossal film, in scale and technical accomplishment that dwarfs nearly all its blockbuster competition in terms of ambition and scale of action. However it also suffers from many of the issues that plague Bays films and his Transformers ones in particular, proof that not all the necessary lessons were learned from Revenge of the Fallen, though Moon is a distinct improvement on that bloated and excessive sequel.
.
Set a few years after the events of the first two films Dark of the Moon once again concerns itself with the daily life of Sam Witwicky (Shia LeBouf), this time as he struggles to find a job and make his way out in the world. We also discover that in the time between films he has been ditched by his girlfriend (Megan Fox who was ousted from this outing) and is now seeing the new piece of eye candy Carly Spencer (played by model Rosie Huntington-Whiteley), as such it is difficult to build up much sympathy for Sam’s initial frustration in the film at being unappreciated for his part in saving the world and unable to find employment. I generally like LaBeouf as an actor, even when others don’t, but at the start of the film he indulges in all his bad habits, turning the motor-mouthed smart alec dial well up towards unlikeable. 
.
In fact this trait seems to have been inherited by the entire human cast in the film, John Malkovich, Ken Jeong, Alan Tudyk; the list of actors who I like and who end up just grating in this film is disturbingly long. Some of this obviously comes from Bay’s goofy sense of humour and insistence on everyone in the film acting as comic relief, but it also stems from the fact that none of them are playing real characters, they are all a bunch of ticks and quirks and it soon frustrates. Remarkably John Turturro’s returning Agent Simmons is one of the least bothersome characters, along with Frances McDormand’s uptight FBI agent who seems to rise above the silliness that surrounds her. Still it seems that aside from Sam, who is given something of a character arc in the film and some decisions to make, there is very little offered by way of character in the film which is a real shame.
.
Plot wise the film is more straightforward then the second film, if just as nonsensical, the discovery of a crashed Decepticon ship on the moon leads to the revival of the war, culminating in the last half of the film which solely focuses on the battle for Chicago. There is at least a clearer focus on objectives and purpose here and whilst the film is still overlong it moves at a decent pace and once it gets going is an easy watch, despite the aforementioned issues with its characters. In fact once the Chicago scenes start the film barely stops for breathe, delivering set piece after set piece in some of the best sustained and constructed action of Bay’s career. The trouble is that whilst the central objective is at least clear, there is little pacing or rhythm to the action, it works in sections but doesn’t always gel. In some scenes characters will be glimpsed and then vanish, part way through Bumblebee is seen fighting alongside Sam, however in the next scene he has been captured and is about to be executed. It’s a shame really as there are lots of great moments that don’t quite work together as well as they should. It doesn’t help that the logic of what the decepticons are trying to do at this stage is not only unclear, but seemingly illogical that leaves the film without clear stakes. 
.
The lack of this personal touch is a theme of much of Bay’s work and is one of the reasons why he is a frustrating director for me personally. Unlike some I don’t regard him as the devil incarnate (take a bow Mark Kermode) I think he is very talented as an action filmmaker, and who has a good eye for a well staged and ridiculous sequence, but lately more than ever he seems less and less interested in the actual people that populate his films. This is a real problem as you merely end up with the shell of a film, one that might seem fun and entertaining, and contain lots of pretty visuals and explosions, but that lacks (for want of a better word) soul. This summer I also watched Terrence Malick’s Tree of Life, which seems the very antithesis of the Transformers movies, in that it is nothing but soul, focused as it is on character and emotion, things these films could really do with, even in the smallest amount.
.
As it is Dark of the Moon does contain some stunning sequences (one set in a collapsing skyscraper being the stand out) along with some of the best CGI yet committed to film, as well as a very impressive 3D presentation (the first since Avatar that has really wowed me in relation to enhancing the action on screen) but it feels all for nought. Our investment in this world, in these people just isn’t there. Even the Transformers themselves (which I have thus far neglected to mention, mainly because they aren’t especially interesting either) whilst given more prominence than in the other films, don’t come across as particularly likeable or nice. Bumblebee has always been the sympathetic character, and so he remains, but Optimus Prime here merely comes across as something of an arrogant and violent dictator, gleefully slicing through his enemies in ways that struggle to reconcile with his supposed commitment to peace. Though I did appreciate Leonard Nimoy’s addition to the cast as Sentinel Prime for a period, adding some much needed gravitas to the proceedings.
.
Dark of the Moon is a pure sugar rush of a film, and ultimately as unfulfilling as you find the now-empty pack of chocolate to be moments after finishing. Looking back to the first Transformers film (which I still like as the best of the three) there is a heart, an underlying theme of growing up and getting your first car that still rings true. It’s hardly Malick but it’s enough, and it’s what has been missed in the ever escalating spectacle ever since.

No comments: